Somehow, someone didn’t know how to spell “school” and put it in the asphalt. This was outside 3 schools.
Wonder if s/he knew how to pronounce it.
And we get pissed at people who call 911 for stupid stuff…
Somehow, someone didn’t know how to spell “school” and put it in the asphalt. This was outside 3 schools.
Wonder if s/he knew how to pronounce it.
And we get pissed at people who call 911 for stupid stuff…
I think it’s interesting that some hospitals have such restrictive policies regarding the use of restraints. It’s also interesting that some ED staff members adopt such a naive and coddling approach toward people who should be in restraints. Even more interesting is their attitude toward us when we show up with someone in restraints, as if we just came from some bondage party.
“Well, he’s not on a psych hold.”
“Why is he in restraints?”
“Well, that’s inappropriate.”
“Combativeness is just a sign of a head injury. ”
“I know he’s cracked out of his mind, but you still can’t restrain him.”
Really?
Sorry, my security staff called in sick. The ten other people who usually work with me in the back of the ambulance are all on break. The cops left to go to different calls. Pardon me if I can’t subdue this 250-pound asshole felon on my own.
“Sir, are you going to cooperative with us?”
“Uh, yeah.”
“You guys can let him out of those restraints.”
“Are you sure?”
“Yes, we’re sure.”
And then, of course, it always ends with, “SECURITY!” Followed by, “WE NEED ATIVAN STAT!”
“Oh, what’s that? You say something? You talking to us? Oh, you want us to help you restrain this guy now? Well, we already transferred care to you, and that just wouldn’t seem appropriate…”
If you’re not rich or in politics, Wall Street is not your friend. You would think this is obvious, but somehow people keep voting against their self-interest.
Wall Street does not have the best interests of the public and their employees in mind, and that should be obvious to anyone. I say “should,” because it apparently is not obvious to everyone.
And this is relevant because Wall Street’s obsession with profits in the private sector directly influences the way public sector employees are treated as well. For instance, if you think the ongoing war on public sector pensions, the continuous assault on collective bargaining rights, the coordinated blame game directed at rank-and-file employees and retirees, the phantom budget crises, the lies and errors and omissions and obfuscations being told by politicians and their media mouthpieces every hour of every day, etc. are anything but driven by the Fat Cats, you’re fucking high.
This is how Ellen Schultz’s book, Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit from the Nest Eggs of American Workers, starts:
In December 2010, General Electric held its Annual Outlook Investor Meeting at Rockefeller Center in New York City. At the meeting, chief executive Jeffrey Immelt stood on the Saturday Night Live stage and gave the gathered analysts and shareholders a rundown on the global conglomerate’s health. But in contrast to the iconic comedy show that is filmed at Rock Center each week, Immelt’s tone was solemn. Like many other CEOs at large companies, Immelt pointed out that his firm’s pension plan was an ongoing problem. The “pension has been a drag for a decade,” he said, and it would cause the company to lose thirteen cents per share the next year. Regretfully, to rein in costs, GE was going to close the pension plan to new employees.
The audience had every reason to believe him. An escalating chorus of bloggers, pundits, talk show hosts, and media stories bemoan the burgeoning pension-and-retirement crisis in America, and GE was just the latest of hundreds of companies, from IBM to Verizon, that have slashed pensions and medical benefits for millions of AMerican retirees. To justify these cuts, companies complain that they’re victims of a “perfect storm” of uncontrollable economic forces – and aging workforce, entitled retirees, a stock market debacle, and an outmoded pension system that cripples their chances of competing against pensionless competitors and companies overseas.
What Immelt didn’t mention was that, far from teing a burden, GE’s pension and retiree plans had contributed billions of dollars to the company’s bottom line over the past decade and a half, and were responsible for a chunk of the earnings that the execcutives had taken credit for. Nor were these retirement programs – even with GE’s 230,000 retirees – bleeding the company of cash. In fact, GE hadn’t contributed a cent to the workers’ pension plans since 1987 but still had enough money to cover all the current and future retirees.
And yet, despite all this, Immelt’s assessment wasn’t entirely inaccurate. The company did indeed have another pension plan that really was a burden: the one for GE executives. And unlike the pension plans for a quarter of a million workers and retirees, the executive pensions, with a $4.4 billion obligation, have always been a drag on earnings and have always drained cash from company coffers: more than $573 million over the past three years alone.
So a question remains: With its fully funded pension plan, why was GE closing its pensions?
This is one of the quetions this book seeks to answer. Retirement Heist explains what really happened to GE’s pensions as well as to the retirement benefits of millions of Americans at thousands of companies. No one disputes that there’s a retirement crisis, but the crisis was no demongraphic accident. It was manufactured by an alliance of two groups: top executives and their facilitators in the retirement industry – benefits consultants, insurance companies, and banks – all of who played a huge and hidden role in the death spiral of American pensions and benefits.
I don’t make that much money, but apparently I bled my employers dry.